Puppet-Gluster now available as RPM

I’ve been afraid of RPM and package maintaining [1] for years, but thanks to Kaleb Keithley, I have finally made some RPM’s that weren’t generated from a high level tool. Now that I have the boilerplate done, it’s a relatively painless process!

In case you don’t know kkeithley, he is a wizard [2] who happens to also be especially cool and hardworking. If you meet him, be sure to buy him a $BEVERAGE. </plug>

A photo of kkeithley after he (temporarily) transformed himself into a wizard penguin.

A photo of kkeithley after he (temporarily) transformed himself into a wizard penguin.

The full source of my changes is available in git.

If you want to make the RPM’s yourself, simply clone the puppet-gluster source, and run: make rpm. If you’d rather download pre-built RPM’s, SRPM’S, or source tarballs, they are all being graciously hosted on download.gluster.org, thanks to John Mark Walker and the gluster.org community.

These RPM’s will install their contents into /usr/share/puppet/modules/. They should work on Fedora or CentOS, but they do require a puppet package to be installed. I hope to offer them in the future as part of a repository for easier consumption.

There are also RPM’s available for puppet-common, puppet-keepalived, puppet-puppet, puppet-shorewall, puppet-yum, and even puppetlabs-stdlib. These are the dependencies required to install the puppet-gluster module.

Please let me know if you find any issues with any of the packages, or if you have any recommendations for improvement! I’m new to packaging, so I probably made some mistakes.

Happy Hacking,

James

[1] package maintainer, aka: “paintainer” – according to semiosis, who is right!

[2] wizard as in an awesome, talented, hacker.

Introducing Puppet Exec[‘again’]

Puppet is missing a number of much-needed features. That’s the bad news. The good news is that I’ve been able to write some of these as modules that don’t need to change the Puppet core! This is an article about one of these features.

Posit: It’s not possible to apply all of your Puppet manifests in a single run.

I believe that this holds true for the current implementation of Puppet. Most manifests can, do and should apply completely in a single run. If your Puppet run takes more than one run to converge, then chances are that you’re doing something wrong.

(For the sake of this article, convergence means that everything has been applied cleanly, and that a subsequent Puppet run wouldn’t have any work to do.)

There are some advanced corner cases, where this is not possible. In these situations, you will either have to wait for the next Puppet run (by default it will run every 30 minutes) or keep running Puppet manually until your configuration has converged. Neither of these situations are acceptable because:

  • Waiting 30 minutes while your machines are idle is (mostly) a waste of time.
  • Doing manual work to set up your automation kind of defeats the purpose.
'Are you stealing those LCDs?' 'Yeah, but I'm doing it while my code compiles.'

Waiting 30 minutes while your machines are idle is (mostly) a waste of time. Okay, maybe it’s not entirely a waste of time :)

So what’s the solution?

Introducing: Puppet Exec[‘again’] !

Exec[‘again’] is a feature which I’ve added to my Puppet-Common module.

What does it do?

Each Puppet run, your code can decide if it thinks there is more work to do, or if the host is not in a converged state. If so, it will tell Exec[‘again’].

What does Exec[‘again’] do?

Exec[‘again’] will fork a process off from the running puppet process. It will wait until that parent process has finished, and then it will spawn (technically: execvpe) a new puppet process to run puppet again. The module is smart enough to inspect the parent puppet process, and it knows how to run the child puppet. Once the new child puppet process is running, you won’t see any leftover process id from the parent Exec[‘again’] tool.

How do I tell it to run?

It’s quite simple, all you have to do is import my puppet module, and then notify the magic Exec[‘again’] type that my class defines. Example:

include common::again

$some_str = 'ttboj is awesome'
# you can notify from any type that can generate a notification!
# typically, using exec is the most common, but is not required!
file { '/tmp/foo':
    content => "${some_str}\n",
    notify => Exec['again'], # notify puppet!
}

How do I decide if I need to run again?

This depends on your module, and isn’t always a trivial thing to figure out. In one case, I had to build a finite state machine in puppet to help decide whether this was necessary or not. In some cases, the solution might be simpler. In all cases, this is an advanced technique, so you’ll probably already have a good idea about how to figure this out if you need this type of technique.

Can I introduce a minimum delay before the next run happens?

Yes, absolutely. This is particularly useful if you are building a distributed system, and you want to give other hosts a chance to export resources before each successive run. Example:

include common::again

# when notified, this will run puppet again, delta sec after it ends!
common::again::delta { 'some-name':
    delta => 120, # 2 minutes (pick your own value)
}

# to run the above Exec['again'] you can use:
exec { '/bin/true':
    onlyif => '/bin/false', # TODO: some condition
    notify => Common::Again::Delta['some-name'],
}

Can you show me a real-world example of this module?

Have a look at the Puppet-Gluster module. This module was one of the reasons that I wrote the Exec[‘again’] functionality.

Are there any caveats?

Maybe! It’s possible to cause a fast “infinite loop”, where Puppet gets run unnecessarily. This could effectively DDOS your puppetmaster if left unchecked, so please use with caution! Keep in mind that puppet typically runs in an infinite loop already, except with a 30 minute interval.

Help, it won’t stop!

Either your code has become sentient, and has decided it wants to enable kerberos or you’ve got a bug in your Puppet manifests. If you fix the bug, things should eventually go back to normal. To kill the process that’s re-spawning puppet, look for it in your process tree. Example:

[root@server ~]# ps auxww | grep again[.py]
root 4079 0.0 0.7 132700 3768 ? S 18:26 0:00 /usr/bin/python /var/lib/puppet/tmp/common/again/again.py --delta 120
[root@server ~]# killall again.py
[root@server ~]# echo $?
0
[root@server ~]# ps auxww | grep again[.py]
[root@server ~]# killall again.py
again.py: no process killed
[root@server ~]#

Does this work with puppet running as a service or with puppet agent –test?

Yes.

How was the spawn/exec logic implemented?

The spawn/exec logic was implemented as a standalone python program that gets copied to your local system, and does all the heavy lifting. Please have a look and let me know if you can find any bugs!

Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this addition to your toolbox. Please remember to use it with care. If you have a legitimate use for it, please let me know so that I can better understand your use case!

Happy hacking,

James

 

Preserving your working directory in gnome-terminal

I use gnome-terminal for most of my hacking. In fact, I use it so much, that I’ll often have multiple tabs open for a particular project. Here’s my workflow:

  1. Control+Alt+t (My shortcut to open a new gnome-terminal window.)
  2. cd ~/code/some_cool_hack/ # directory of some cool hack
  3. Control-Shift-t (Shortcut to open a new gnome-terminal tab.)
  4. Hack, hack, hack…

The problem is that the new tab that I’ve created will have a $PWD of ~, instead of keeping the $PWD of ~/code/some_cool_hack/, which is the project I’m working on!

The solution is to add:

# including this ensures that new gnome-terminal tabs keep the parent `pwd` !
if [ -e /etc/profile.d/vte.sh ]; then
    . /etc/profile.d/vte.sh
fi

to your ~/.bashrc. Now everything works perfectly!

Many thanks to Matthias Clasen and Ray Strode for figuring this one out!

One side note: this used to be the default, but for some reason it broke around Fedora 19 or 20. Maybe it had to do with my fancy prompt, but everything is working great now.

Happy Hacking,

James

 

Speaking at SCALE today!

I’ll be giving a talk at SCALE today about automatically deploying GlusterFS with Puppet-Gluster and Vagrant. I’ll be giving some live demos, and this will cover some of the material from:

Automatically deploying GlusterFS with Puppet-Gluster + Vagrant!

and it will contain excerpts from:

Screencasts of Puppet-Gluster + Vagrant

I’ll also be talking about some new upcoming features, and am happy to answer all of your questions!

The talk will be part of Infrastructure.next and is starting around 1:30 or 2pm in the Century AB room.

If you’re not able to attend, or you’d like a more personalized demo, send me a note! I’ll be around for the next few days.

Thanks to Joe Brockmeier and John Mark Walker for hosting the event and sending me here.

Happy Hacking,

James

 

Scathing review of the Lenovo X240

I’m using a Lenovo X201 with 8GiB of RAM. Apart from some minor issues, I’ve been very satisfied with this laptop. It’s over four years old, and so I decided to see what’s available on the horizon. I did not buy an X240 because of the following reasons:

The X240 has only one slot for RAM and thus supports a maximum of 8GiB.

I think it’s pretty ridiculous for any successor to the X230 to support less RAM. In and of itself this is a deal breaker! My X201 has 8GiB, and I wish it had more! It doesn’t make sense to settle for less on new kit. In other words, Lenovo is stating that 8GiB ought to be enough for anybody.

The X240 keyboard is missing buttons.

The X201 keyboard has PageUp and PageDown keys in addition to the Forward and Back buttons which are located above the Left and Right arrow keys. It also has dedicated Insert and Delete keys. This is all to be expected, and is awesome.

The X240 removes the dedicated Forward and Back buttons, and replaces them with the (now relocated) PageUp and PageDown keys. To use the Forward and Back buttons, you now need an extra finger to hold the Fn button.

If that wasn’t bad enough, the Insert key now shares a button with the End key, which makes common Shift+Insert sequences near impossible to anyone that isn’t either a cephalopod or an Emacs user. Time to update the pedals to include an Fn key.

The X240 keyboard is missing buttons.

The X240 keyboard is missing buttons.

It’s also worth mentioning that the dedicated volume controls are gone.

The X240 “Trackpad”/”Touchpad” is now buttonless and unusable.

The mechanics of the new Touchpad makes it unusable! It has no buttons, and instead it feels like it is travelling 1cm vertically when it is pressed! This throws off any fine positioning you had with your cursor. Try it for five minutes, and you’ll quickly learn that this alone ensures that this machine can only be used as a desktop. Many, many users are complaining about the feel of the new pad. This feels like an attempt to imitate the look of an Apple product, instead of trying to maintain the functionality of the X series, except that the hardware isn’t very good.

Interlude…

I could deal with the below issues, if my top three (above) issues weren’t strong deal breakers! They are all easy to fix too! I hope these are addressed so that I can post a follow up “rave” article. ;)

Other issues/differences…

The X240 has a new, incompatible power adapter.

Lenovo has decided it needs to squeeze more money out of users by introducing new, backwards-incompatible technology. To this end, the well-known barrel adapter is now gone, and it has been replaced by a strange rectangle. You might as well throw out all your old power bricks, as Lenovo has said they won’t offer a compatibility adapter. Apparently, they used to sell such an adapter, but it has been discontinued.

The X240 has a new, incompatible docking bay.

If you were a fan of docking, you’ll now have to purchase a new bay.

The X240 has a combined microphone/headphone jack.

Minimalist designs and the abundance of cheap phone headsets has reduced the dual jack design to a combined single jack. I don’t like the change, but I realize there’s not much that can be done to prevent it.

Lenovo has a terrible warranty program.

Getting a hardware replacement with the Lenovo “return to depot” service can take about two weeks. Bringing your laptop in to a service centre is equally challenging. The locator database is out of date, and once you do find a service centre, many are unwilling to accept your hardware because they’re backlogged with work! If you are lucky enough to get a part replaced, hope that it isn’t defective or DOA. I had to go through three rounds of bad motherboards graphics on my X201. The on-site service is a good option if you can afford it.

Conclusion

Instead of iterating and improving on the much-loved X series, Lenovo has decided to sacrifice its followers in trying to appeal to a low-end laptop market. Once the model of power and portability, the X series is now designed for users who are afraid of having too many buttons or too much RAM.

The X220 and X230 are not available for sale anymore. The X250 isn’t due before 2015. I’ve extended the warranty of my X201 to the maximum of five years. Let’s hope someone at Lenovo reads this article and can make a difference before it’s too late. I’m happy to consult and demo new hardware if you contact me. I’d genuinely like to help.

Happy Hacking,

James

Show the exit status in your $PS1

As an update to my earlier article, a friend gave me an idea of how to make my $PS1 even better… First, the relevant part of my ~/.bashrc:

ps1_prompt() {
	local ps1_exit=$?

	if [ $ps1_exit -eq 0 ]; then
		#ps1_status=`echo -e "\[\033[32m\]"'\$'"\[\033[0m\]"`
		ps1_status='\$'
	else
		ps1_status=`echo -e "\[\033[1;31m\]"'\$'"\[\033[0m\]"`

	fi

	ps1_git=''
	if [ "$(__git_ps1 %s)" != '' -a "$(__git_ps1 %s)" != 'master' ]; then
		ps1_git=" (\[\033[32m\]"$(__git_ps1 "%s")"\[\033[0m\])"
	fi

	PS1="${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}\u@\h:\[\033[01;34m\]\w\[\033[00m\]${ps1_git}${ps1_status} "
}

# preserve earlier PROMPT_COMMAND entries...
PROMPT_COMMAND="ps1_prompt;$PROMPT_COMMAND"

If you haven’t figured it out, the magic is that the trailing $ prompt gets coloured in red when the previous command exited with a non-zero value. Example:

james@computer:~$ cdmkdir /tmp/ttboj # yes, i built cdmkdir
james@computer:/tmp/ttboj$ false
james@computer:/tmp/ttboj$ echo ttboj
ttboj
james@computer:/tmp/ttboj$ ^C
james@computer:/tmp/ttboj$ true
james@computer:/tmp/ttboj$ cd ~/code/puppet/puppet-gluster/
james@computer:~/code/puppet/puppet-gluster$ # hack, hack, hack...

You can still:

$ echo $?
42

if you want more specifics about what the exact return code was, and of course you can edit the above ~/.bashrc snippet to match your needs.

Hopefully this will help you be more productive, I know it’s helping me!

Happy hacking,

James

Screencasts of Puppet-Gluster + Vagrant

I decided to record some screencasts to show how easy it is to deploy GlusterFS using Puppet-Gluster+Vagrant. You can follow along even if you don’t know anything about Puppet or Vagrant. The hardest part of this process was producing the actual videos!

If recommend first reading my earlier articles if you’re planning on following along:

Without any further delay, here are the screencasts:

Part 1: Intro, and provisioning of the Puppet server.

Part 2: Initial building of the Gluster hosts.

Part 3: Finishing the Gluster builds.

Part 4: GlusterFS client mounting and tests.

Part 5: Mixed bag of code, infrastructure tours, examples and other details.

I hope you enjoyed these videos. Thank you to the Gluster.org community for hosting them. If you liked these videos, please consider sponsoring some of my work, or making a donation!

As a side note, the only screencast tool that worked was gtk-recordmydesktop, however it deleted my second recording (which had to be re-recorded) and the audio stopped working one minute into my third recording (which had to then be separately recorded, and mixed in). Amazingly, pitivi was the only tool which worked to properly mix them together!

Happy Hacking,

James

PS: Please note, you may not sell, edit, redistribute, perform, or host these videos elsewhere without my permission. I especially don’t want to see them on youtube until Google let’s me unlink my youtube account! If you do want my permission to use these videos for something, contact me, and we can work something out. I’ll surely allow it if it’s not for something evil. If you’d rather have an interactive, live demo, let me know!